 |
|
A Hill veteran sends along the Kyl-Lieberman amendment on Iran (.pdf), saying it may come up for a vote as early as tomorrow. "In particular, take a look at Section (5) in the Operative portion." He adds, "This will be a hard amendment for Members to oppose ... because a no vote can be spun as 'You don’t care about Iranian munitions killing American troops.'”
Tuesday Update: "Votes got postponed until tomorrow morning, but Kyl-Lieberman is on tap for tomorrow. Schumer allegedly working on a side by side. Levin will likely vote yes, while ... Reid is likely to vote no. ... The alternative will still condemn iran, but probably use less inflammatory language and likely make clear that it is not authorizing force in any manner."
Wednsday Update: "It passed 76-22. They agreed to remove Sections 3 and 4 from the operative portion of the amendment, which included the language many feared as a backdoor authorization for force. So it was much better. That said, the language on the IRGC designation as a terrorist organization remained. Remember, this was just a Sense of Senate and has no binding force. But that may strengthen the hand of [those] inside the Administration who are arguing for designation of the entire IGRC, not just the Qods Force or other individual elements." Here's a breakdown of the vote.